The Weakest Link of the Hong Kong Democrats

The pro-China inclination is the cancer to the Democrats of Hong Kong, a ghost which has been haunting them for a long time which they find it hard to be free from it. As long as the Democrats have such inclination, the interests of Hong Kong will be inevitably sacrificed. Many Democrats are good people in terms of moral standard. However, what is the point for them to exist as a political power if they cannot stand for the interests of their local voters? The root of the Democrats is in Hong Kong, not China. Hong Kong is the place where the Democrats can take root. The image of beautiful China in their mind is only an illusion implanted in their mind through education since their childhood.

That is the weakest link of the Hong Kong Democrats. They just can’t break up with the Chinese patriots. Among the Hong Kong Democrats, many of them are Chinese patriotic leftists with connections with Chinese Communists. They have no self-identity as a “Hong Konger”. In the era of British colonial rule, these Democrats were against the colonial government by identifying themselves as Chinese. Such kind of movement was the extension of the struggle of Chinese nationalists against colonialism. Their ideology rested on their patriotism on China and the leftist socialism. Although these Chinese nationalists broke up with Beijing authority after certain incident (Note: Tiananmen Massacre in 1989), they were far from setting free from the ghost of self-identity as a Chinese. They had no clear and definite self-identity as a Hong Konger, and therefore unable to identify themselves as a group different from Chinese. These Democrats were cautious when they dealt with the Communists, but they had no immunity against China. Once the Communists cast the spell of nationalism, Democrats find themselves paralyzed and unable to counteract.

As long as the Hong Kong Democrats are the advocates of Chinese unification, they are the hostages of Chinese Communists and Chinese colonialism. That is why when the local interests of Hong Kong are exploited for the sake of China, the Democrats never voice their protests. Hong Kongers have never learned to become masters themselves. They were contented to keep themselves away from politics, and the position of Hong Kong as a mere economic city. In the meantime, Hong Kongers’ attachment to the “Greater China” was so severe. Local media and Chinese schools have been brainwashing Hong Kong people with distorted Chinese nationalism. This made them become paralyzed in their struggle for democracy: whenever they protest for democracy, the Chinese government cast the spell of nationalism, then the Hong Kong people find themselves paralyzed. The basis to fight for democracy is to regard yourself as an independent region with unique cultural heritage. Only when you find yourself different from the others, you have the aspiration to become the master of your own. Such difference is not just in terms of economic standards, the sense of group identity makes much more importance.

China is difficult to be changed without efforts for several decades to several centuries. Those who wish to change China are at the end changed by China. Preserving yourself and to keep an eye on the change is the only true path to take.

他在這裡出現 本身就是不公不義

《蘋果日報》又來販賣悲情了。

販賣悲情,本來並不是甚麼大問題,《蘋果日報》創刊以來,亦從來無掩飾過它是一份渲染觀感效果,訴諸感情來誘導讀者取態的報紙。可惜《蘋果日報》的取態,跟其老闆的意識形態盟友 ― 民主黨一樣,越來越脫離民情。於是販賣悲情,往往得到適得其反的效果。

double fail

《蘋果》十月二十七日刊出了雙非家長王太的訪問,標題為「雙非家長心聲︰不想孩子生在沒公義的地方」。《蘋果》取態雖然日漸脫離民情,但煽情催淚方面還是有一手的。追求公義,不就是跟香港人一樣的核心價值嗎?中國不是也有好人嗎?缺乏理性邏輯思維的師奶和八十後左翼社運青年,單看標題,已不禁動容。《蘋果日報》裡面,果然還是有人才的。

再來就是王太的盡訴心中情︰「我選擇來香港生寶寶,只因為香港是一個有公義的地方;我不想我的孩子在一個沒有公平公義的地方出生!」,又稱要孩子學廣東話成為真正香港人,再加上一張舐犢情深的母子合照。至此,警覺性低一點的,對這些殖民香港的侵略者僅有的心防都解除了 ― 「原來中國還是有很多好人的嘛,還是有中國人肯融入香港社會的嘛。所以香港人就不應該歧視他們啦,中國人還有不少是很有文化,有教養的嘛。」

所以說為什麼那麼多香港男人會北上娶老婆,大陸女人的軟言儂語果然是一流的,隨便三言兩語就能讓你們這些殤梗男人全身酥軟了 ― 咳咳,當然,某一部份除外。

言歸正傳,以文論文,《蘋果日報》這篇作文可算是中上之作,可以作為販賣悲情的範文拿去貼堂。

可惜的是,《蘋果日報》做的資料搜尋工作也太馬虎了。原來該位雙非學童,早前才被影到當眾小便,而他的爸爸接受訪問時,指有幼稚園以廣東話面試是歧視。於是「中國也有好人論」不攻自破,而王太口中那麼動聽的公義,早就化成了雙非童在街上的一灘小便。《蘋果日報》的穿崩程度,直逼CCTVB。

就算單就報導而論,王太和雙非童的背景都甚為可疑︰王太的老公王生,原來在河南平頂山經營煤礦生意。關於煤礦,看倌首先想起的是甚麼? 我想起的,是事故頻發的礦難新聞。王氏夫婦的本業本身合不合乎公義,已經是一個大問題。

退一萬步講,你來港產子追求你自己口中的公義,香港本地學童的公義,又有誰來維護?梁振英政府?泛民議員?社運左膠?你唔係同我講笑吓嘩?原來為了自己口中的「公義」,就可以搶奪本地學童接受教育的權利﹔原來為了自己口中的「公義」,就可以任意踐踏道德價值和社會秩序。

所作所為全為一己之私,口中卻可以臉不紅氣不喘大大聲宣稱自己追求「公義」,行徑真的跟社運左膠異常類似。難怪左膠要這麼盡力幫助這些惺惺相惜的知己了。苦了的,只是為了子女通宵排隊,還要忍受某些文人說「仇人也是鄰舍」― 這種不知攞景還是贈慶式冷嘲熱諷的港爸港媽們。

香港刻下需要的 是驅魔人

香港確實是被邪靈附身了。那個邪靈,就叫左膠。

支持香港電視的集會,又再重蹈反國教集會的覆轍。由於「雙輝一葉」近年在社會人士的口誅筆伐下已成過街老鼠,於是民陣、民主黨和左翼廿一等維穩社運組織今次搬出看似人畜無害,名不經傳的陳璟茵聯同民主黨人區諾軒,一同騎劫整場運動。雖然本土派早在集會開始前事先警告,而集會期間亦有義士嘗試將左膠趕落台,但不少巿民以至香港電視員工,在左膠騎劫並膠化整場運動之時,已萌去意。到了深夜,留守政總的集會人士只剩不到十分之一,雖然左膠今次受盡千夫所指,然而客觀效果是左膠又一次成功瓦解了整場運動。

HKTV

香港人,你仲有幾多次可以輸?

你地已經輸咗奶粉、床位、學位、生活空間,連遙控器既選擇權都輸埋,你仲有幾多野可以輸?

原本集會的訴求非常清晰︰要求政府對拒絕香港電視發牌申請提出合理解釋,無合理解釋的話,絕不退讓。不過份屬遊行初哥的港視員工又那裡是左膠的對手?左膠看準時機,先以小組討論方式,在集會群眾內部製造迷惑和混亂,並趁人不備,上台奪咪,提出事先未知會亦未經港視員工同意的四個方案。此時已有意興闌珊的群眾深感無癮而陸續散去。直到晚上近十時,才有義士上台呵斥左膠霸佔講台,騎劫運動,然而正義來得太晚,驅魔來得太遲,運動早就大勢已去。

若果上次反國教運動左膠的行徑諸君仍未看得清楚,細心觀察今次集會的過程,基本上就是上次的快鏡重播,左膠的鬼上身過程,來來去去,都是同一套路。

這場集會,是左膠戰術上的勝利,戰略上的失敗。左膠名為公義,實質維穩,看似社運鬥士,實為孤魂野鬼的本質,香港人在這次運動中看得清楚明白。

根據道家內丹理論,人的生機,繫於精、氣、神三者,三者,精氣神受損,自然易招邪靈入侵。左膠這類遊魂野鬼之所以敢在光天化日之下騎劫運動,散播謬論,主因還是香港人精氣神不足,無自主意識,抵抗力弱,自然容易撞邪鬼上身。

要對抗邪靈,香港人需要的,是驅魔人。驅魔人唔係話做就做的。有睇過吓驚慄電影的,都知道驅魔人不是東方的佛教高僧,就是基督教的神父。做得驅魔人,必須信念堅定,才能怯邪伏魔。香港人直到最近幾年,才慢慢確立起自主意識,而社會上大部份人仍然是惲惲噩噩,對自己的身份問題不甚了了。這正正是精神煥散的表現,以致左膠這類遊孤野鬼有可乘之機。捉鬼除魔的任務,只能交給意志堅定,知行如一的志士去執行。

本土志士們,伏妖除魔的大任,你們準備好未?

The Origins of Political Parties of Hong Kong

The political environment of Hong Kong in 1960 to 1970 was quite severe.

It was the era of fierce conflicts between the Kuomintang (or Chinese Nationalist Party) with the Communists in Hong Kong. The Cultural Revolution in China was the catalyst to the 1967 Leftist Riots in Hong Kong. As you may know the term “paid thugs” (Note: it means the thugs paid for by the Communists to stir up the riots), you know that is closely connected to the political movements in China. Hong Kong was exposed to the threat of military attacks during the decades of 1960s and 70s. It was rumoured that the British had plan of nuclear counterattacks. Therefore, the Hong Kong people in these two decades were living in the threat of the Word War III.

The pro-democrats and native power were nurtured by the Chinese Communist in their infancy. “The 70s”, an old political magazine in Hong Kong, had been censored by the authority in Taiwan. In the old days of Hong Kong, there was no such thing as “Localists”. (there were only roughly three divisions existed: pro-British, pro-Taiwan/Kuomintang and pro-Communist). The rise of sense of consciousness as a Hong Konger was a recent development since 1970s. It was the time when the identity of “Hong Konger” was born.

The Development of Democrats in Hong Kong

Democrats in Hong Kong shared the same origin from the “Leftists” (In political sense of Hong Kong, it always means “Pro-Communist” and “Pro-Beijing” political view). It was the Tiananmen Massacre which led to their breakup.

That is why we see the Democrats are still chained by their belief, and why they cannot view an issue from the view as a Hong Kongers. That is why I say Hong Kong may take the path of fascism someday. It is a supplement to the impotence of the Democrats in taking side with Hong Kongers.

Tiananmen Massacre led to the breakup of Leftists and the founding of Pan-democracy camp. In the days of British rule, they were actually the Leftists, or to put it more clearly, Communists. Many politicians today were the leaders of labour movements under British rule.

The Development of Leftists in Hong Kong

The emergence of the Leftists was similar to that of Pan-democrats: it composes of people holding different ideas: there are discontented labours, patriots, bandits, speculators, native nationalists, and even prodigals.

Radical leftists have their markets. Whenever there are the poor, there are always radical leftists. In a society where the poor is the majority, radical leftists have large lebensraum.

Radical leftists have not much political power. It is because they don’t know how to organize it.

The Leftists in Hong Kong has long relied on the Chinese Communists to get the nurture of ideology and assistance. Soon they become reliant and lack the power of self-sustainability. How can you succeed without weaning?

New Leftists will soon rise in Hong Kong. They will emerge from the poor. No matter how rich Hong Kong is, there is always good supply of poor people. While the Leftists mentioned in the previous paragraphs, are merely pseudo-leftists.

Karl Marx was actually right in many things with many correct observations. He only failed in making predictions.

Revolution and Angry Youth: The destructive power of violence

The Violence of Revolution

Even in the peaceful days like today, many people still think that the solution to many problems is to “kill those bad guys” or “force them to do what we want with guns on their heads”. One of the most instinctive reflections of humans in solving the problems is to eliminate the “bad guys”. When humans can’t think of the ways to solve problems, violence becomes the way out.

That’s why we have so many wars. Yugoslav Wars is a real example. When the society evolves to a stage when the social problems cannot be solved, people tend to blame on the “bad guys” and to eliminate them as the way out. As in Nazi Germany, whether the Jews were really the problem to the Reich was not the point. The point is that Hitler could make use of them as the scapegoats for the Germans to vent their angers when they found themselves leading a hard life.

The Breeding Ground of Angry Youth

Angry Youth is the product of the environment, angry youth doesn’t shape the environment.

Looking back in history book, you will find that the rise of Angry Youth in Japan and Germany was the result of their unresolvable despair in their economic conditions. Humans are the animals who can live comfortably when the economy is fine. They won’t resort to radical solutions.

Those living under heavy pressure become Angry Youth is that they find no way out. The feeling of frustration is the breeding ground for Angry Youth.

So it’s still the result of the economy. The distant cause of Angry Youth is the distorted development of economy, which is the hardest problem to resolve. During the recessions, everyone suffers, even the rich, the landlord, the tycoons or bureaucrats. Recessions are always the breeding grounds of Angry Youth. Once you say you have to down with them, you become an Angry Youth.

If the economic problems get no way out, the society either declines, or gets controlled by the Angry Youth.

Angry Youth’s Political Speculations

The People’s Republic of China has always been led to the wrong way by the Angry Youth since its establishment till today.

You may offend anyone except the Angry Youth. Why? First of all, Angry Youth mentality is an epidemic, it can spread through different ways: by literature, by discussion, by education or by television. Mind control or media control cannot curb its spread. You may curb the spread of democracy and freedom, but not the Angry Youth mentality.

The mentality of the Angry Youth is basically to blame all their failures to “foreign enemies”. This claim is a tautology which can no way be verified. So to become an Angry Youth is always easy, like addiction; while keeping away from it is hard. It’s hard because you have to convince yourself that the “foreign enemy” is not the problem.

The wish of an Angry Youth is the rise of the nation, rise to an extent strong enough to make a big mistake. Of course, only for a country with potential to become a power can nurture the Angry Youth. Their hope is to accumulate more cards enough for them to bet them all. That is like a guy working in McDonald’s for ten years and to bet all his savings in a night in a casino.

If they win the bet, they will bet more till they lose. That’s like the teaching of the “Art of War”: a country wins all the wars will perish. A country which wins the wars all the time becomes more arrogant and eager to wage wars (as demonstrated by Japan). They think that we used to win before, and we are winning now, so we will win in the future. This kind of gambler will always end as a beggar.

A major setback is good to them. This can wake the Angry Youth up from their dreams and perish their unrealistic hopes. Only by failures will they be convinced that their country has no hope to become strong.

(Imagine the mentality of the Japanese Imperial Army when they heard the “Jewel Voice Broadcast” – Japanese emperor’s script on unconditional surrender of Japan in World War II)

Only when the hopes of those Angry Youth perish with no more illusions on the rise of their nations, those countries get salvation.

A country will become more sensible when it becomes free from those self-proclaimed patriots.

Reason of Revolution and its Participants

There are always a majority of common people hoping for stability with some vested interest groups which form our society. They have no interests in revolutions and are insensitive to political developments. What they hope for is to get some power and interests and keep the status quo forever. However, it is exactly such mentality and behaviour leads to revolutions.

Revolution does not need the support of the majority. It will not be a peaceful one or ordered. It is not like those portrayed in media or books as an enthusiastic movement participated by all the people. It rather turns out like this: when a significant group of insensitive people suddenly find their interests greatly affected, they will rise up and call themselves revolutionaries, even they have no idea on the meaning of revolution the day before.

Angry Youth should not be trusted, Politics should be violence-free

I can’t see the bright future of the human society from the Angry Youth. They always call themselves patriotic; they hope for the rise of China, imagining one day China’s sovereignty will extend to where, and who will be beaten and conquered, and so on. Yet they have no idea how to promote the well-being of humans; what kind of thinking, systems and virtues they can deliver to the mankind. They don’t care about solving the problems of humans and the nature.

This is no patriotism. They are just demanding others to sacrifice and kneel to the knees of the country, but not themselves. This is hegemony, not patriotism. But they don’t know the difference between the two.

A country full of hatred and hostility to the world will only bring a dark future to the mankind. Their success will only lead to the rise of a dark and evil power. Politics should always be based on the love to the world, the nature, mankind, civilization, freedom and life.

香港人,行不改姓,坐不改名

香港人就係香港人,前面加上任何形容詞的,都是假貨,都係三鹿奶粉。

香港人就係香港人,不添一字,一筆不減。係「香港人」三字以外加上任何形容詞者,蝗蟲無疑。

hk is my country

香港人,沒有新舊之分,符合成為香港人條件的,就係香港人。要驗名正貨,靠的當然不只係一張三粒星身份證,甚至不是靠BNO。識寫正體字,講廣東話,係最基本條件。最重要係,當香港既利益同外國利益(包括某其他國家)有衝突時,你企係邊一邊。

妄圖將「香港人」三字加上形容詞的,是昩於香港文化,不識這三個字的含金量。九九九九千足純金,一旦混上雜質,價值即時大降。「香港人」三字值錢之處,正正有融合新思舊學,新居舊鄰的帝國氣度。

周雖舊邦,其命維新。香港城邦雖然歷史悠久,生命力卻異常頑強,正因為善於古為今用。香港俗語裡有一句謂︰「老土當時興」,最低俗最底層既例子: 在我們父輩的證件相出現的大框眼鏡,今日以四十年的周期輪迴了一遍。香港人有善於運用舊有文化,結合當代潮流,革故鼎新,創造自身文化的能力。

英治時代的政府官員職稱︰理民官、布政司等古典名稱,被用於現代公共政府機關,廉政公署的徽號,用的是古雅的隸書圖章。香港法庭的法官往往亦身兼古代華夏父母官的角色,判詞往往帶有濃厚的教誨色彩。既然新舊融合對香港並無難度,又何需強調新舊之分,將之對立起來?

不識箇中玄妙者,才會自作聰明,畫蛇添足,露出效法《1984》極權者之故智,試圖創造Newspeak將香港人洗腦的馬腳。

香港人就係香港人,蝗蟲就係蝗蟲,中間沒有任何灰色地帶,沒有任何討論空間。你唔企係人果邊,你就係屬於蟲果一方。

該道歉的是你,孔令瑜

(原載於熱血時報)

關注中港家庭權利聯席昨日召開記者會,向上月發起刊登抗拒中港融合廣告的立法會議員范國威、毛孟靜及保育人士譚凱邦下,要求三人就「源頭減人」的言論道歉。

孔令瑜的用詞︰「下戰書」,真是妙到毫巔。真正守護本土利益的香港人與左膠,現在正正處於不是你死,就是我亡的戰爭狀態。本土香港人,面對的是日漸壯大的新移民群體,以及其所帶來的經濟、生活環境以至文化上的衝突。本土香港人在新移民的壓逼之下,在各方面的空間不斷被侵蝕。

左膠經常強調香港從來是一個移民城巿。請問一句,一九九七年之前的英治政權下,一樣有大量從中國南來的移民人口,為何當時沒有造成今天如此尖銳的社會矛盾?為何當年的新移民無造成如此大問題?今日才造成問題?

hung

原因有三。一者,當年南來的移民來的時候大都孑然一身,隻身抵港。寄人籬下,自然要忘卻自身的過去,盡力融入香港本地生活。九七前南來的香港人,大都勤勤勉勉,胼手胝足養活一家人。他們是中共的棄民,不少是舊社會的地主或士紳階層,縱然家業飄零,半生以來的學識教養卻不會隨家業而磨滅。入鄉隨俗,這批人多少都懂得。

二者,當年的英治政府對移民問題處理得宜,在經濟政策上,政府巧妙地將龐大的移民轉成香港工業的勞動力﹔在社會政策上提供基本醫療和房屋福利,社會資源隨著香港經濟發展而增加,避免新舊族群之間爭奪資源而變成零和遊戲。

三者,當年的國際戰略環境正好有利香港發展成為一個勞力密集的工業城巿。隨著歐洲從二戰的廢墟中重建而發展出龐大的消費巿場,以及中國閉關自守,令香港經濟有能力吸納這批新移民。

需要注意的是,英治政府的居留權政策是因時制宜的。當英治政府意識到香港的勞動密集型工業經濟差不多已到樽頸,就立即收緊居留權規定,撤銷抵壘政策,嚴格限制中國人來港。移民政策,係隨著香港社會發展需要去決定,係從現實主義既角度出發,是現實政治的體現。

現實政治之下的政策,自然與滿口普世價值,頭腦發熱的左膠思維大相逕庭。哀香港之不幸,在九七之後,香港的居留政策正正是捨正道而弗由,走上了左膠大力鼓吹的歪路。

以這種歷史脈絡的角度出發,范國威、毛孟靜及譚凱邦三人「源頭減人」的呼籲,不過是繼承當年英治政府務實主義的精神。如今連本地屋邨師奶都知道,香港刻下的人口比例已係過於稠密,無論在房屋、教育、醫療方面的資源爭奪日趨激烈。與此同時,香港在經濟轉型方面毫無寸進,相對其他亞洲三小龍,早已在不同的產業領域上有所成就。本土香港人和新移民之間的關係,已處於零和遊戲的死局。此時此刻還在鼓吹大力輸入新移民的左膠,絕對係與全香港人為敵。

一個簡單的資源分配問題,被左膠和有心在香港實行人口殖民的中共港共政策扭曲,一律詮釋為歧視新移民的問題。

如果甄別政策,和自主的移民審批權是歧視的話,依照左膠的標準,大部份發達國家,包括以大熔爐自詡的美國,和號稱自由平等博愛的法國,無一不是在歧視新移民。但左膠永遠不敢向美國法國投訴,只敢恰和理非非的香港人。左膠濫用「歧視」一詞,副作用就是令到真正的歧視問題失焦。

如果說歧視的話,很多新移民比本土香港人更快上到公屋,又是否歧視本地人?

左膠之惡,在於否認現實世界,係有先後之分,主客之分。左膠否認世間所有的不同,所有的差別,除了貧富差別。他們的邏輯就是︰窮人必定是好人,有錢人必定是壞人。本地人比新移民有錢,所以本地人必然是壞人,本地人有責任將自己的家產分予新移民。所以即使對香港社會未有貢獻,仍然可以臉不紅氣不喘伸手大拿六千港元。

地獄之路,通常都由善意鋪成。當初孔令瑜等一批左翼社運人士大力支持新移民來港定居的時候,有無為他們設想過,這些人是否真的適合在香港定居?不少新移民來港後投訴不適應生活環境,甚至聲言返大陸住好過係香港,證明這群左膠失職。失職之一,係無提醒事主考慮清楚是否適應香港生活,才決定是否定居香港。失職之二,係無克盡己職,幫助新移民真正融入社會,令他們成為地道的香港人。左膠經常卸責政府政策,事實上作為社福機構的負責人,左膠同樣難辭其咎。

一個負責任的社福機構負責人,係應該留意新移民這個族群的生態,向政府提供恰當的意見。幫助新移民真正融入社會,是最為重要的目標。要達致這個目標,新移民的數量必須控制在可控範圍之內,不能主客顛倒,妹仔大過主人婆。從這角度出發,社福機構是應該支持香港有自主的移民審批權,這才是對香港社會,和服務的客戶負責任的態度。大量新移民自成一個群體,又如何融入香港社會?偏偏左膠就反其道而行,認為家庭團聚係天賦人權,大哂。左膠作為社福機構負責人,根本上係失職,亦係香港社會撕裂的始作俑者。

左膠口裡雖說要幫助新移民融入社會,但結果只能淪落到幫佢地攞福利,輪公屋這類低層次行政工作,何解?

因為左膠是無家無國之人。左膠是色盲,眼中只能看到貧富之分,階級之分。他們眼中的世界,不如我們般五彩斑爛﹔他們的世界是黑白世界,自成一國。在左膠眼中所有的文化都是平等,包括在公共場所大便,也是一種文化,所以他們的信仰本身,與幫助新移民融入社會的工作,先天上有衝突。自己都不了解本土文化,對本地文化無絲毫欣賞熱愛之情,又如何幫助新移民融入社會?左膠根本係連自己份工都未做得好既losers。

孔令瑜,你自己色盲不要緊,但請強逼全香港人跟你一樣,只用黑白二色去看世界。無勸導無力融入香港社會的新移民別勉強來港,是你失職﹔造成香港社會嚴重分化對立,是你無能。孔令瑜,要向全香港巿民道歉的人,是你。